I have no problem with any of this article. We don’t need press gatekeepers; we can be our own gatekeepers. What we need is no censorship but rather free competition of ideas. Sure, free-speech antagonists can point to downsides to that (like the Nazis marching in Skokie) but that’s disingenuous because it has the fewest downsides. Of all the alternatives, free speech is the least worst. 
Presstitute: Perfect Moniker for much of our Press, today!
I wish this was two posts, there's so much to unpack.
I have no problem with any of this article. We don’t need press gatekeepers; we can be our own gatekeepers. What we need is no censorship but rather free competition of ideas. Sure, free-speech antagonists can point to downsides to that (like the Nazis marching in Skokie) but that’s disingenuous because it has the fewest downsides. Of all the alternatives, free speech is the least worst.