The Club Q Shooter is *not* Non-Binary

Stop. Playing. Along.

One of my favorite Christmas movies is “Miracle on 34th Street.” It culminates in a courtroom trial that centers on whether or not a man is really Santa Claus.

It’s been on my mind constantly since the Colorado Springs shooter’s attorneys announced that he is “non-binary.” In the time since the announcement, I’ve watched otherwise intelligent, serious commentators speculate as to whether or not the shooter has a “real” non-binary identity, or if it could possibly be “a troll.”

For heaven’s sake, people. Stop. Just stop.

He’s not “non-binary” because nobody is non-binary.

Here are two proofs.

1. People who declare themselves non-binary assert a difference between themselves, who are non-binary, and the rest of us, who fit into the binary. They thus create a new binary of which they are a part, proving that they are not in fact non-binary.

2. Non-binary is said to be an “umbrella term” meant to cover people who don’t “conform” to “gender expectations.” What they mean by this, if you push them to be clear and specific, is always the retrograde sex role crap we supposedly left behind decades ago.

   Nobody conforms to all of it. Nobody. If you think you know of someone who does, have them email me. Ah, but if he conforms to all the manly ones, first you’ll have to go drag him out of the field where he’s killing food. And if she conforms to all the womanly ones, you’ll have to go to the kitchen, have her put on some shoes, make sure her water isn’t about to break, and teach her what a computer is.

   What’s that you say? My examples of sex role expectations aren’t correct? They’re too extreme? I dispute that. I also dispute whatever sex role expectations you, or anyone else, are using to defend “non-binary” as a thing. Sex role expectations vary dramatically even within the single country of the United States. I grew up in the deep South and moved to New England as an adult, and what constitutes an “average” or “typical” man or woman is radically different between the two.

   Globally, the range is so wide that any group defined as containing those who don’t fit into all of the male or female role expectations is simply another way of describing “people who are alive.”

   “Non-binary” is Woke speak for “I’m special!” And that’s all it is.

   It. Means. Nothing.

Non-binary isn’t a thing. Stop pretending it is; you’re handing the Wokesters an undeserved and unearned victory. Don’t cede that ground.

Housekeeping: comments are open for paid subscribers. If you want to participate but can’t afford a paid subscription, email hollymathnerd at gmail for a freebie. Links are automatically tweeted when I publish and re-upped via scheduled tweets, but I’m still not actively on Twitter. If you are, RT’ing my automatic tweet or otherwise spreading the link is very much appreciated. Thank you!