Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cordolf's avatar

The trick (or at least one of them) to get ChatGPT to take positions that it otherwise seems to state are counterfactual is to ask it to write a response by a person that believes whatever position you want it to take. If you tell it that person is a character in a story or dialog it will do a pretty good job of supporting the position (based on what’s out there) even if it’s “own” position is the opposite.

This technique has also been used to trick it into giving information or explanation that it has been taught should not be made available easily (e.g. how to make meth).

Expand full comment
HUMDEEDEE's avatar

The separation between artifice and reality grow more and more blurry with every iteration of AI. Already I question almost everything I see, read and hear, and it's only getting worse. I hardly know what to make of it, or how to live with it. I've always been a bit of a cynic and a skeptic, and this AI stuff is not helping! Soon I'll think everything is a deep fake.

The Christmas poem is sweet. I love your Christmas decor. I wonder if I can resist the temptation to use a program like that to create something and not pass it off as my own. Here's how I'd be tempted. I would propose a story subject with a few details, and then edit and refine the AI output with my own **imprimatur** on it. Sort of quasi-plagiarism I suppose. Interesting times. Interesting indeed.

**what's the correct word I'm looking for? I don't think imprimatur is quite what I mean. I guess I could ask ChatGPT

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts